Tim Handel vs Piet Luis Pinter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 May at 08:17 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Handel vs P. Luis Pinter

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Handel 1 - 0 Pinter
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tim Handel winning 2 and Piet Luis Pinter winning 0. The last match between Tim Handel and Piet Luis Pinter was at the M15 Warmbad Villach, 26-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Tim Handel getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Handel | 1 |
| Pinter | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Warmbad Villach(05-26-25)
T. Handel vs P. L. Pinter H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.69% (210-154) | Career Total W/L | 55.21% (53-43) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Handel vs P. L. Pinter Match Preview:
- Pinter excels in second serve performance, winning 41.62% of these points recently, while Handel secures 38.58%.
- In return games, Handel has the advantage on second serve returns, capturing 48.17% of points compared to Pinter's 44.83%.
- How do these players compare on first serve returns? Pinter claims 31.01% of points, marginally outperforming Handel's 29.41%.
- Under pressure, Handel proves formidable, saving 50.96% of breakpoints versus Pinter's 47.3%.
- For overall performance this past year, Pinter has a superior win rate of 57.89% compared to Handel's 49.18%.
- Both players prefer clay, but Handel holds a stronger career win rate of 62% over Pinter's 56% on the same surface.
- At the event level, Pinter performs slightly better in Futures/ITF tournaments with a 57.89% win rate compared to Handel's 51.92%.
- Pinter faces higher-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 33.42, while Handel's opponents average at rank 376.85.
- Considering deciding sets, Pinter shines with a 57% success rate, as opposed to Handel's 47% this last year.
- For converting breakpoints, Pinter leads markedly, succeeding in 48.48% of opportunities against Handel's 33.62%.
Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):
Pinter's robust performance in second serve situations and his superior breakpoint conversion rate suggest a decisive edge. Handel's higher percentage of second serve return points and his prowess at saving breakpoints do pose a significant challenge.
Although Handel exhibits strength on clay and under pressure, Pinter's overall recent match success and his ability to prevail in deciding sets mark critical advantages.
Accounting for both players' performances over the same last year's event circuit and the caliber of opposition faced, Pinter appears to have the upper hand.
Given these factors, I predict Pinter is more likely to secure a win in this upcoming tennis match.
Tim Handel vs Piet Luis Pinter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Handel vs P. L. Pinter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:14:29 | Average Match Time | 1:14:29 |
| 54% (27/50) | 1st Serve % | 47% (21/45) |
| 85% (23/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (15/21) |
| 65% (15/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 75% (3/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 44% (20/45) | Return Points Win % | 24% (12/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Handel Recent Matches Played
P. L. Pinter Recent Matches Played

T. Handel vs P. L. Pinter Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.69% (210/154) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.21% (53/43) |
| 57.04% (474/357) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.75% (115/103) |
| 52.53% (4191/3787) | Games Win/Loss | 51.83% (1089/1012) |
| 56.45% (35/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 61.35% (154/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.91% (52/41) |
| 41.18% (21/30) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 962 | Aces Total | 106 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 896 | Total Double Faults | 82 |
| 1:27:49 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 427.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 217.8 |
| 63% (13229/21096) | 1st Serve % | 60% (1740/2880) |
| 69% (9076/13229) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1073/1740) |
| 48% (3815/7867) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (518/1140) |
| 42% (914/2166) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (116/257) |
| 40% (8585/21317) | Return Points Win % | 40% (1103/2777) |
| 36.67% (11/19) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 59.58% (199/135) | Futures W/L | 55.79% (53/42) |
| 57% (206/359) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (52/95) |
| 56% (59/106) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (8/18) |
| 46% (50/108) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (17/27) |
| 87% (213/186) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (52/45) |
| 13% (213/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (52/7) |
| 16% (151/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (44/8) |